Tuesday, October 15, 2024

3T Writing Tidbit

Great plots, whether a mystery, romance, or action thriller, are often described as like onions. There's a problem. Oops, remove a layer -- and it's worse. Oops, remove another layer -- it's even worse than that! Oops, remove layer -- this can't get any worse... and then you remove another layer and it does!

 But how do you write a plot like that? It's harder than it looks!

When I first tried to learn how to write computer software, I was awful. I couldn't program my way out of a wet paper bag. Software development is essentially being presented with a problem you're trying to solve. I know the problem -- how do I get to the solution?

Just like writing a plot that peals away layer by layer. Impossible!

Turns out, there's a way to make both software development and plotting easier. It's the same approach you might use to solve one of those maze puzzles. Just start at the end. Start with the solution.

What is your happily ever after for your plot? (Assuming it's not a tragedy...) Once you know that, what's the worst thing that could happen to foil that HEA? Once you know that, what might have happened immediately prior to cause that worst thing? Is that cause itself a not-so-worst-thing problem? What caused that not-so-worst problem? Are there a couple possibilities? You can red-herring one and then reveal the other. What caused the red herring? What caused the real issue? Are any of these causes a secret?

It's more a framework, a way of thinking, than an algorithm or formula, but it does make it easier to construct those plot onions without so many tears.

Published since 2009, over the years I've accumulated various items of writing wisdom. The Third Tuesday Writing Tidbit showcases these items in no particular order. Click here to see all 3T Tidbits.  

Tuesday, October 8, 2024

2T Repeat Performance - The Problem with Clichés—it’s not what you think

I've done a number of blog tours over the years, posting on different sites. Now I'm bringing them to you!

Originally published April 16, 2013 for Savvy Authors Blog

The Problem with Clichés—it’s not what you think

Every writer has flaws to overcome, or as they’re known in the business world, “opportunities”. With some it’s bland characters, with some it’s Swiss cheese plots.

My problem was—“What’s a cliché?”

Oh, sure, I knew the definition. A trite word or expression. Worn out, no longer fresh, overused. But by that definition, wouldn’t “the” be cliché? Or even “it was the”, as in “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times”? (Dickens, anyone?)

“Don’t be ridiculous,” The Pedagogue sneers. “Clichés are old phrases, such as ‘Dry as dust’.”

Okay, I got that. Clichés were “over the hill”. And I was happy…until I read an article that said heroes with chiseled faces and beautiful, plucky heroines are cliché. Worse, I found out that even a character growling eighty-seven times in a manuscript is cliché. (Yes. I really did this.)

So…trite phrases weren’t the only type of cliché? Again I was confused.

“It’s any overused word or phrase,” The Pedagogue says, but the sneer is gone. “A description that’s hackneyed. Lost its color, its meaning.”

“But I like chiseled-faced heroes and I understand the meaning of ‘dry as dust’.” I’m getting militant now. “‘You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make him drink’ is pretty colorful as far as I’m concerned. How do I know what’s cliché?”

“You just know.”

The point was, I didn’t “just know”.

Until I ran across UrbanDictionary.com in its early days, where regular phrases are turned inside out and spun onto their heads. Clear away the definitions that are bodily functions, and you get some fresh, witty stuff.

It inspired me to create Nixie, a 5’0”, 100-pound punk rock musician who never says anything straight (I paired her with a 6’-plus blueblood vampire lawyer. Good times). And suddenly my writing sang and descriptions bled with color and emotions had depth and action ripped.

A light went on in my head. Um, I mean, my brain fizzed with I get it. Clichés aren’t simply worn-out phrases. Clichés still have meaning. “Dry as dust” still means really dry. “You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make him drink” still means “opportunity doesn’t equal achievement”.

What those phrases don’t have is anything more. The reader processes them and understands them, but those words don’t punch her in the gut or grab her throat or explode in her eyes.

Think about “Dry as dust”. What do you picture? A pile of dust? If you want your reader to picture a hot attic with motes of dust floating in the sere sunlight, dry as dust won’t do it.

How about leading your horse to water? Do you picture your gelding, the gentle brown of his eye changing to a militant gleam as you approach the trough? I’m going to guess many of us don’t have the kind of daily experience with a horse that would make that image pop.

Here’s the main point. Writing tells a story. Good writing makes the reader live the story.

Air that’s “dry as dust” is dry. Air that scours your nasal passages is yikes. Air sawing into your lungs or breathing air that’s like inhaling acid—did you almost feel that dryness?

A cliché isn’t simply a trite phrase or words leached of their meaning. It’s any word or phrase that sits on the page. That’s important, so let me say it another way. It’s anything that goes in one eye and out the other. Anything that slips through the brain leaving meaning and nothing else. A cliché isn’t dead—when read it’s perfectly understandable. But it doesn’t resonate into more; it doesn’t sing or sting or knock the reader over the head with I get it now.

How does a writer get beyond cliché? Ooh (rubs hands gleefully), I’m so glad you asked.

  • Use strong nouns and verbs. Really, this is like eating right, and fixes a variety of ills, not just clichés.
  • Read for places you understand but don’t immediately picture what’s going on. These are places of opportunity to freshen the writing.
  • Read for places you picture what’s going on, but don’t shudder or cry or swallow hard or grab your throat in vicarious sympathy with the hero/heroine. Is this supposed to be a place of relaxation or rest in the tension? Okay, but there better be something compelling on the rest of the page.
  • Put yourself in your character’s shoes…er, look out of her eyes. If she has an ounce of personality…um, more backbone than an ant?...anyway, she’ll have her own perspective and so her own way of experiencing the world. Musicians might hear the wobble in the voice of an otherwise confident politician; a harried mom might experience everyone around her as demanding and whiny.
  • Use character-specific swearing. More below.
  • If you can’t get a passage out of bed, go back to the basics. What are you trying to say? Now imagine making a movie of it. How would you show it? What is the actress feeling (smelling, hearing, seeing, touching) as she moves through the action? How would she show that feeling (scent, sound, sight, touch)?

One of my button issues is the overuse of swearing—not because it’s offensive, but because, as too much pepper makes for a numb tongue, too much swearing makes for a numb brain, and even the freshest writing in the world won’t stimulate a stunned mind. Darn, pfui, and their cayenne cousins are a wonderful way to grab the reader’s attention with small smacks. But used every other paragraph, they’re a verbal tic or worse.

Dig deep into the character to tailor that pepper into fresh barbs. In Biting Oz, my heroine Gunter Marie “Junior” Stieg is a musician whose day job is selling sausage. Here’s her take on her  hero, Glynn Rhys-Jenkins. Her swearing has a sausage theme (my comedy tends to be a bit broad, but you can tailor your substitutes to your situation). Also note the hero has the cliché blue eyes and chiseled features, but through Junior’s eyes they take on a new dimension.

A glow of sapphire eyes, a flash of dangerous planes, the impression of broad shoulders. Glimpses through lowered house lights and dark wings hadn’t prepared me for seeing him in full light for the first time. Great Braunschweiger, he was beyond gorgeous, as in punch-out-my-heart-and-use-it-to-club-me-senseless stunning.

 

And one longer passage to leave you with. Heroine Junior and her friend Rocky (both musicians) are discussing hero Glynn. Here’s how it could have been written.

Rocky said, “So how do you know Glynn?”

“I don’t. I just met him tonight.”

“So I only imagined he was looking at you ‘that way’?” She opened the house doors and we walked down the aisle.

“What way?”

“Like you’re hot.” 

“Really?” Glynn thought I was sexy?

And here’s how it actually was written.

Rocky said, “So how do you know Glynn?”

“I don’t.”

“Oh.” The normally neutral syllable was lengthened and pitched high, filling it with her skepticism.

“I don’t,” I repeated, as if saying it again would convince her. “I just met him tonight.”

“So I only imagined he was looking at you ‘that way’?” She elbowed open the house doors and trotted down the aisle.

“What way?”

“Like he wanted to eat you up. Which reminds me, did you see Rob brought pit chocolate?”

My voice wouldn’t work. Glynn was looking hungrily at me?